December 1, 2023


Arts Eternal

‘Rifkin’s Festival’ review: Woody Allen, for completists only

The Situations is fully commited to examining theatrical film releases in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since moviegoing carries risks through this time, we remind readers to stick to overall health and protection rules as outlined by the Facilities for Illness Command and Prevention and local wellness officers.

Woody Allen’s 49th characteristic, “Rifkin’s Competition,” is arguably his worst. The award-winning and prolific, nevertheless also controversial filmmaker has minor if anything new to supply right here, rehashing already rehashed themes, attitudes, longings and gripes to dispiritingly diminishing returns. It is even fewer influenced than his previous photograph, 2019’s “A Rainy Day in New York,” and which is saying a ton.

Allen states that he chose veteran character actor Wallace Shawn, with whom he’d labored on “Manhattan,” “Radio Days” and other videos, for the guide job of retired New York film scientific studies professor — and the writer-director’s hottest proxy — Mort Rifkin mainly because he wished a “real intellectual” in the part. But Shawn, 75 when the movie was shot in 2019, is so woefully miscast that no amount of money of cerebral panache (which barely registers below anyway) can make his drippy, charisma-cost-free Mort somebody whose pity celebration we want to show up at. He’s explained here as a “cranky minor introvert” and it is unfortunately apt.

The trifling, usually anachronistic and artificial story finds Mort hunting back again — using abnormal and largely pointless narration — to a trip that he took with his glamorous publicist wife, Sue (Gina Gershon, a dazzling place), to the San Sebastián International Film Competition, exactly where her French director consumer, Philippe (Louis Garrel), is premiering a new do the job. But, as Mort admits to the shrink to whom he’s recounting his tale, he went not to view videos or appreciate the attractiveness of the Spanish coastal resort town (vividly captured by ace cinematographer Vittorio Storaro of “Reds” and “Apocalypse Now” fame) but to maintain an eye on Sue, whom he suspects of possessing a detail for the smoldering Philippe. (In typical Allen vogue, Philippe is significantly youthful than Sue, who’s significantly more youthful than Mort.) It is a wan and predictable setup.

Much of the movie requires Mort killing time about San Sebastián when Sue is immersed in publicity responsibilities — and it’s possible more — with Philippe. Movie snob Mort may perhaps dislike the pretentious director’s buzzy new antiwar motion picture on mere basic principle but is, at coronary heart, jealous of Sue’s scarcely concealed infatuation with the soaring, self-possessed and beautiful artist. That Mort is a would-be novelist, blocked by his incapacity — and a probably self-sabotaging need — to build a thing monumental a la Dostoevsky, only adds to his envy and angst.

But Mort gets a elevate when he visits nearby medical doctor Jo Rojas (Elena Anaya) to evaluate his just lately acquired upper body pains and gets to be smitten by the kindly, rather, seemingly soulful medical professional. Like Mort, Jo is in a waning relationship her partner (Sergi López) is a tempestuous, adulterous painter. So despite becoming another much-fetched match (Jo could technically be Mort’s granddaughter), he retains out a flicker of hope. But Mort’s strained endeavours to get to know Jo, blended with the performers’ utter lack of chemistry and the contrivances of Anaya’s position, make for an uncomfortable and implausible collection of scenes.

Also ineffective are Mort’s string of desires and mind’s-eye fantasies, each individual of which are black-and-white-rendered riffs on typical films by these kinds of masters as Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Ingmar Bergman and Luis Buñuel. What at a person place in Allen’s long career could have felt clever and impressive simply just arrives off like a hoary product to pad an undernourished tale. A late-breaking “Seventh Seal” sendup showcasing Christoph Waltz as “Death” feels especially gimmicky.

Total pacing is flaccid and far too numerous scenes peter out when they ought to punch. But maybe the movie’s greatest infraction is that there is rarely a chuckle in it. A person bit, in which Mort needs aloud that he’d listen to from a “qualified medical professional,” may have been amusing if it wasn’t such a brazen retread of the Marshall McLuhan second in “Annie Hall.” (Ah, “Annie Hall”!)

Steve Guttenberg, Tammy Blanchard, Richard Sort and recurrent Allen collaborator Douglas McGrath exhibit up in tiny components but, in general, one particular wonders if casting listed here is a issue of who, in a write-up-#MeToo era, will continue to concur to operate with the director immediately after his alleged own transgressions. (He was accused in 1992 of sexually abusing his then-7-year-previous adopted daughter a choose later rejected the allegation.)

In his heyday, a Woody Allen movie was an annual occasion to foresee, rejoice and share. “Rifkin’s Festival” is simply just something to endure — and for completists only.

‘Rifkin’s Festival’

Rated: PG-13, for suggestive/sexual materials and some drug use, language and thematic factors.

Running time: 1 hour, 32 minutes

Participating in: Starts off Jan. 28, The Landmark, West Los Angeles also on VOD